(First appeared in New Era 4 February 2015)
THE birth of our son has brought us a lot of pleasure, but also added to our responsibilities, and worries for what the future will bring. At the same time my father is reaching pensionable age and I have been assisting him in ensuring his financial security. This has meant looking at both the financial services that we must put in place for our children, as well as examining the services that my father had planned. These include how we manage banking, pension funds, savings accounts, medical and hospital cover as well as purchasing larger items like a motor vehicle and a house on credit. All these products and services are meant to ensure that we can sleep more peacefully at night because we have the knowledge and ability to access them.
The question remains though at the back of my head, “What if these services were not available to me?” And the even larger question looms, “What about my fellow consumers who struggle to get the same access to allow them to sleep peacefully at night?”
The issue of access to financial services and products is referred to as “financial inclusion”. This term is often used by the Bank of Namibia, Namfisa, Ministry of Finance and the Financial Literacy Initiative (FLI) to encourage the providers of these services to widen the net to allow more “inclusion”. When looking at financial inclusion, I prefer to define what services consumers are being excluded from so that we can identify what should be addressed. Very often the exclusion of consumers to financial services include: a) insufficient income; b) high risk of non-payment; c) discrimination (on the basis of race, marital status, etc.); d) lack of information – both by the clients and by the service providers; e) weak contract enforcement by the courts; f) product features – use of technical terms for example that are not fully understood; and g) price barriers due to market imperfections.
Thus financial inclusion means minimising or removing financial exclusion arising from market or government failures. Some supporters of financial inclusion want to see a situation where banks do not even charge a fee when a client deposits money for safe-keeping.
However, one of our regular readers who is a financial advisor warns of the expectations that these services should be provided at no cost. “Although technology has advanced so much that we can reduce costs significantly, there is no such thing as a free lunch. Costs will just be claimed somewhere else.”
Financial service providers use the issues mentioned to design their products and services and this (unfortunately) leads to the best services and products being offered to the more well-off clients. The people who need these services are thus being penalised twice – on the availability of the service and the extra high cost they must pay to make use of the service. The financial providers however insist that all clients have equal access to their services.
When all is said and done, peace of mind is essential to all Namibians. We as the consumers, and government and service providers need to take ownership and have justness in solutions for all consumers. After all is said and done, we cannot continue with the belief that “all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”
Honour thou Elders that thou days may be long
(First appeared in New Era 28 January 2015)
The past week my father called me from South Africa to come
and assist him with his pension pay-outs he has to receive now that he has
turned 65. My father was born during the apartheid era (in Walvis Bay) and had
completed his schooling in the Cape Province of South Africa. After school and
a few years I the private sector, he had chosen the army as a career and was
enlisted in the South Africa Coloured Corps. This was his job and not just the
normal two years stint (conscription) that was expected of every citizen. He
spent several years serving in the army, including doing duty in the northern
parts of the then South West Africa.
When I grew of age (being 18), there were many arguments in
our house as I was an active member of the student organisations protesting
against the South African occupation of Namibia. Having been born in Windhoek,
I feel I am a citizen of Namibia even though my father felt he was on the side
of the South Africans.
After Independence, it took a few years for the arguments
about politics to eventually also accept reconciliation as a reality. For me
the turning point was in 2004 when my father was declared disabled and unfit to
continue employment. It was at that time that the Bible’s commandment of
“Honour thou Mother and thou Father that thou days may be long” really struck
me.
At that time in 2004, my father was fighting the banking
system that refused to accept his disability and were threatening to auction
his house as he was not able pay his mortgage. This despite the fact that he
had an insurance policy (taken out by the bank) that was supposed to cover him
in the eventuality of death or disability. The bank in question insisted that
his disability was a “previous condition” and thus not covered by the policy.
After a year-long battle with me at his side, we were able force the bank (yes,
we had to force them to meet their obligation) to accept the medical reports of
experts and have the insurance policy pay off his mortgage.
This lesson of what businesses do to avoid giving
satisfaction to their customers (and thus making more profits) is what led me
to becoming the consumer activist I am today.
As consumers we have started to have culture of “consumer
social responsibility” towards our elderly as we willingly allow pensioners,
pregnant women and people with disabilities to be served first when there are
queues.
I would like to see our businesses in Namibia also take this
attitude and provide their corporate social responsibility through discounted
prices for the elderly, and not only on groceries, but also public transport,
electricity, water and telecommunications. Would it not be wonderful if our
elderly could receive up to 50% discount on their water and electricity and
perhaps even completed amnesty from paying rates and taxes to the local
authorities? It would be gladdening to my heart (and, according to the Bible,
add years to my life) if the government owned enterprises would also provide a
minimum number f credits or products and services to the elderly as a way of
honouring for their many years of service to our beautiful, peaceful country?
These state-owned enterprises and agencies include MTC, Telecom, Namwater,
Nampower and even the local supplier of Coca-Cola, Namibia Beverages to name
but a few.
On this topic, would it also not be a sign of a mature
country to provide sufficiently for our elderly with a state pension of at
least N$ 1,200 per month? If we give this a little thought, perhaps we too can
honour our mothers and fathers that our days on earth might be long.
#MTC pay back the money
(This first appeared in the New Era of 14 January 2015)
THERE is a quote I like to use when giving consumers advice, “He who buys what he does not need steals from himself.” This advice is normally given before the festive season to remind others (and my own family) that no matter how tempting the advertisement is of a product, always ask yourself whether the product has any use in your life.
I can show you more than a cupboard full of things that I have bought over the years that I have never used. This advice is of course only usable if you are the one doing the buying – sometimes you receive a gift and you smile and say thank you without knowing whether you will ever use the gift in question. I still have a Bart Simpson tie that I will never wear.
When I became a consumer activist I noticed how consumers are misled through advertising (or the savvier word “promotion”) to purchase something they do not need and then have no recourse to getting their money refunded. This has led to many countries introducing a “cooling-off period” – a period of time during which the consumer may cancel a purchase. In this way the purchase of (especially) expensive items like houses and vehicles can be cancelled if the buyer becomes aware that they may have bitten off more than they can chew. This is also often the case when in the shop and the salesperson convinces you of the product they are selling rather than of the product you need.
Last month I did not buy SuperAweh airtime from MTC as I usually do when at work. My week of special phone call prices had expired but then I received a message from MTC that I was being charged N$2.00 for “future data usage”. I do not need data for my cellular as I have a laptop and unlimited 4G access and I thought this is rather presumptuous. I was rather angry, as “I had just bought what I do not need” and was stealing from myself.
Rather than steal from myself, I activated the SuperAweh package and thought nothing more about it. A week later, MTC sent another SMS informing me that my SuperAweh would expire and I should renew it. However, this expiry happened at midnight of the day indicated and, lo and behold, I found myself stealing another N$2.00 from myself at exactly 2 seconds past midnight.
Upon enquiry on social media I became aware that I was not the only consumer stealing from themselves. The worst case was a company that owned a fleet of cars that were using tracking devices over the cellular network. These devices were installed securely within the vehicles and this was done purposefully to prevent thieves from being able to remove the devices.
This company with a fleet of over 50 trackers now find themselves stealing over a N$100.00 a day for data usage – because MTC has made it the responsibility of the user to opt out of the promotion.
The regulator, the Communications Regulatory Authority of Namibia (CRAN), received numerous consumer complaints during this period and reacted very quickly. In the press release CRAN clearly states that “the mandatory imposition of this promotional tariff and placing an obligation on the consumer to cancel the participation in a promotion, which the consumer has not initially subscribed to, is not in line with the provisions of Section 79 of the Communications Act and can therefore not be supported by CRAN”.
Aha! I was not buying something I did not need, but rather MTC was charging me for a service I did not need.
THERE is a quote I like to use when giving consumers advice, “He who buys what he does not need steals from himself.” This advice is normally given before the festive season to remind others (and my own family) that no matter how tempting the advertisement is of a product, always ask yourself whether the product has any use in your life.
I can show you more than a cupboard full of things that I have bought over the years that I have never used. This advice is of course only usable if you are the one doing the buying – sometimes you receive a gift and you smile and say thank you without knowing whether you will ever use the gift in question. I still have a Bart Simpson tie that I will never wear.
When I became a consumer activist I noticed how consumers are misled through advertising (or the savvier word “promotion”) to purchase something they do not need and then have no recourse to getting their money refunded. This has led to many countries introducing a “cooling-off period” – a period of time during which the consumer may cancel a purchase. In this way the purchase of (especially) expensive items like houses and vehicles can be cancelled if the buyer becomes aware that they may have bitten off more than they can chew. This is also often the case when in the shop and the salesperson convinces you of the product they are selling rather than of the product you need.
Last month I did not buy SuperAweh airtime from MTC as I usually do when at work. My week of special phone call prices had expired but then I received a message from MTC that I was being charged N$2.00 for “future data usage”. I do not need data for my cellular as I have a laptop and unlimited 4G access and I thought this is rather presumptuous. I was rather angry, as “I had just bought what I do not need” and was stealing from myself.
Rather than steal from myself, I activated the SuperAweh package and thought nothing more about it. A week later, MTC sent another SMS informing me that my SuperAweh would expire and I should renew it. However, this expiry happened at midnight of the day indicated and, lo and behold, I found myself stealing another N$2.00 from myself at exactly 2 seconds past midnight.
Upon enquiry on social media I became aware that I was not the only consumer stealing from themselves. The worst case was a company that owned a fleet of cars that were using tracking devices over the cellular network. These devices were installed securely within the vehicles and this was done purposefully to prevent thieves from being able to remove the devices.
This company with a fleet of over 50 trackers now find themselves stealing over a N$100.00 a day for data usage – because MTC has made it the responsibility of the user to opt out of the promotion.
The regulator, the Communications Regulatory Authority of Namibia (CRAN), received numerous consumer complaints during this period and reacted very quickly. In the press release CRAN clearly states that “the mandatory imposition of this promotional tariff and placing an obligation on the consumer to cancel the participation in a promotion, which the consumer has not initially subscribed to, is not in line with the provisions of Section 79 of the Communications Act and can therefore not be supported by CRAN”.
Aha! I was not buying something I did not need, but rather MTC was charging me for a service I did not need.
Neither a borrower nor a lender be
(This first appeared in the New Era of 14 January 2015)
The headline for this week’s column is borrowed from a soliloquy by Polonius in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet where Polonius is giving advice to his son Laertes before Laertes heads back to school.
“Neither a borrower nor a lender be, for loan oft loses both itself and friend, and borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.”
The past month I took my annual leave and I was fortunate to have it coincide with the birth of my son. I would strongly urge fathers (and lawmakers take note) to be there for your child's first few weeks or even months. It makes you appreciate the mother more, and sharing the sleepless nights and stomach cramps does wonders for your relationship. The best part must be the smiles you get for no apparent reason while you child falls asleep in your arms. This is the best investment any father can give and I trust the “return on your investment” will be worthwhile in the long run.
While on leave I noticed a public notice in the newspaper placed by the Namibia Financial Institutions Supervisory Authority (NAMFISA). In the advert, NAMFISA notified all Hire Purchase Outlets and Credit Grantors that the maximum finance charges as per the Usury Act of 1968 is 15.60 percent per annum. NAMFISA has as one of its objectives the protection of consumers of financial services and in this regard administers the Usury Act.
Few consumers fully understand what usury is, how the Authority regulates maximum finance charges and how the consumer can make use of NAMFISA to ensure they are not being overcharged (abused).
First, what is usury? Usury is the practice of making unethical or immoral monetary loans intended to unfairly enrich the lender. In plain English it means the lender is being made to pay too high interest on a loan. Thus the Usury Act is a law to prevent abuse of lenders and puts a maximum rate at which interest can be charged.
Some of the main objectives of the Usury Act, (Act No. 73 of 1968), are to regulate the maximum finance charges (or interest in short) and to ensure that terms and conditions of credit agreements, including Hire Purchase Agreements, are explained to customers and that fairness prevails in all contracts relating to all credit agreements.
In the public notice, Hire Purchase Outlets and Credit Grantors are reminded that the maximum finance charges or interest is calculated at the average prime rate times 1.6 which is currently at 9.75%. Thus the maximum interest that can be charged is 9.75 times 1.6 which equal 15.60 percent per annum.
Thus you as a consumer are protected under the Usury Act from any credit grantor (such as a money lender) from charging more than N$ 15.60 per year on every amount of N$ 100. If you are taking a loan for a shorter period such as a month, the interest rate must be divided by the percentage of the year the loan is granted. In other words, if you are taking a loan for one month, the interest may not be more than 15.60 divided by 12 thus 1.30 percent. If you have taken a loan from a money lender (and we all know how our January finances are), and are repaying at the end of a month, make sure they are not charging you more N$ 1.30 for every N$ 100 you are loaning. Please note that certain lenders also charge administrative fees which are separate from the interest charged on the loan.
If you as a consumer have any queries, kindly contact the Microlending and Credit Agreements Department of NAMFISA at telephone number (061) 290 5000 (main), Ms. Lucrecia Lombardt at 061 290 5130 or e-mail: llombardt@namfisa.com.na.
The headline for this week’s column is borrowed from a soliloquy by Polonius in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet where Polonius is giving advice to his son Laertes before Laertes heads back to school.
“Neither a borrower nor a lender be, for loan oft loses both itself and friend, and borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.”
The past month I took my annual leave and I was fortunate to have it coincide with the birth of my son. I would strongly urge fathers (and lawmakers take note) to be there for your child's first few weeks or even months. It makes you appreciate the mother more, and sharing the sleepless nights and stomach cramps does wonders for your relationship. The best part must be the smiles you get for no apparent reason while you child falls asleep in your arms. This is the best investment any father can give and I trust the “return on your investment” will be worthwhile in the long run.
While on leave I noticed a public notice in the newspaper placed by the Namibia Financial Institutions Supervisory Authority (NAMFISA). In the advert, NAMFISA notified all Hire Purchase Outlets and Credit Grantors that the maximum finance charges as per the Usury Act of 1968 is 15.60 percent per annum. NAMFISA has as one of its objectives the protection of consumers of financial services and in this regard administers the Usury Act.
Few consumers fully understand what usury is, how the Authority regulates maximum finance charges and how the consumer can make use of NAMFISA to ensure they are not being overcharged (abused).
First, what is usury? Usury is the practice of making unethical or immoral monetary loans intended to unfairly enrich the lender. In plain English it means the lender is being made to pay too high interest on a loan. Thus the Usury Act is a law to prevent abuse of lenders and puts a maximum rate at which interest can be charged.
Some of the main objectives of the Usury Act, (Act No. 73 of 1968), are to regulate the maximum finance charges (or interest in short) and to ensure that terms and conditions of credit agreements, including Hire Purchase Agreements, are explained to customers and that fairness prevails in all contracts relating to all credit agreements.
In the public notice, Hire Purchase Outlets and Credit Grantors are reminded that the maximum finance charges or interest is calculated at the average prime rate times 1.6 which is currently at 9.75%. Thus the maximum interest that can be charged is 9.75 times 1.6 which equal 15.60 percent per annum.
Thus you as a consumer are protected under the Usury Act from any credit grantor (such as a money lender) from charging more than N$ 15.60 per year on every amount of N$ 100. If you are taking a loan for a shorter period such as a month, the interest rate must be divided by the percentage of the year the loan is granted. In other words, if you are taking a loan for one month, the interest may not be more than 15.60 divided by 12 thus 1.30 percent. If you have taken a loan from a money lender (and we all know how our January finances are), and are repaying at the end of a month, make sure they are not charging you more N$ 1.30 for every N$ 100 you are loaning. Please note that certain lenders also charge administrative fees which are separate from the interest charged on the loan.
If you as a consumer have any queries, kindly contact the Microlending and Credit Agreements Department of NAMFISA at telephone number (061) 290 5000 (main), Ms. Lucrecia Lombardt at 061 290 5130 or e-mail: llombardt@namfisa.com.na.
Each One, Teach One
As the year comes to an end, I look back at take stock of what our consumer activism has achieved in 2014. Looking across the media spectrum, I am pleased to note that it is not only the New Era newspaper that has a consumer column. In addition, I appreciate the work being done by new media (mostly from within the traditional media houses) in bringing issues to the attention of consumers, activists and lawmakers. Facebook groups such as the Namibia Consumer Protection Group (NCPG) page have seen a drastic increase in postings, as well as feedback from business.
Now that there is more attention on consumer issues, the question must be asked: Has there been an increase in consumer protection during 2014?
The answer is (unfortunately) NO.
Allow me a few examples:
Just this past week, I ran out of credit on my cell phone. I was sent a reminder by my provider that my credit would run out – the warning though came one day before it ran out, not at the same time it runs out as in the past. At first, I was not too perturbed as I would notice after my first call on the next day that I was off the super package. However, the next morning I sent through my SMS request to purchase the package and went about my business as usual. That evening, I received a message that N$ 2.00 was deducted from my account for data usage. I immediately checked my phone as I had never received such a message before. On checking I found that the service provider had sent me a SMS that I could not participate in this offer as I was already on that specific package. Yet, somehow, later in the same day, my package expired. Now I was deducted N$2.00 and did not have enough funds for the super package anymore.
The service provider had changed my agreement with them regarding informing me of when my package rant out, and had started deducting an “automatic” data charge because my phone used data.
Definitely now a New Year’s wish of mine to get the Communications Regulatory Authority of Namibia (CRAN) to clamp down on these “profit” making practices.
In another example, I received the following from a customer:
“Shelve prices at a certain hyper store (name known to Consumer Court) is a joke once you get to the pay-point (till). I had to request the cashier 4 times for 4 different products to charge me the price displayed on the shelf. I have had this experience several times at the same store and at others of the same chain. People are just paying without checking the price. I wonder how many people are robbed in this way on a daily basis. Every N$1 counts and makes up thousands of N$ on a daily basis. Even when you speak to the cashiers they are also acknowledging and complaining, because they are the ones to hear all the complaints and insults from customers.”
This same wholesaler had a complaint through Consumer Court earlier this year and they rectified it within a week. Now however, this same business is back and not doing what is best for the consumer.
The question is thus, as consumer activists we have made the problem known in the media, however Namibian businesses believe (or know) that consumers have no legal recourse and this continue with this type of unethical business practices.
We as consumers must become more active and in the language of the liberation, Each One must Teach One. That is the only way to measure our success and get consumers to know their own rights.
Silencing others is not the answer in religion or politics
I was an Afroplitan living in Paris, France in 1995 during the Metro bombings. Yesterday I was once again watching the news of another religious inspired violent attack (on the media) in Paris. This reminded me of Voltaire, "I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it."
This brings me ta an issue that has bothered me a lot of the past two years. I joined the Electoral Commission of Namibia (ECN) as the IT Project Coordinator in May 2013 and since then have had to face personal insults and verbal attacks on various social media. However, the moment I took issue with any personal attack (like on my personal Facebook page by a Namibia "investigative" journalist), I get reminded that I am an official of the ECN and should act more professionally.
Having been a social commentator since my student days I found it very difficult to understand that other people could confuse my personal life with my professional one. At one point I had to take out my "street manners" learnt in Hillbrow, Johannesburg and give some serious foul language to these characters that got into my personal life. I did not feel good about using foul language (even though it worked) but had to make a point of separating my professional life with my personal opinions.
The attach on @IamCharlie had me once again evaluate the way we as humans react to the opinions of others when we feel that it is contrary to our own. This was further brought to the for by the following post from a friend:
#DemocracyRules!
Rule #1: If you do not wish to be silenced, do not prevent others from speaking.
Rule #2: If you do not want to be restricted, do not limit the movements of others.
This sentiment is not restricted to religions in Africa, but also the political parties. Most political parties (especially the "liberation parties"), have become a religion to their followers. Thus making a political party "holier than thou" and pushing a strategy of faith - even if you cannot see it you must believe in it.
I foresee that as long as we try to silence those who disagree with us, these type of senseless attacks will continue - whether the excuse is difference in religion or political beliefs.
This brings me ta an issue that has bothered me a lot of the past two years. I joined the Electoral Commission of Namibia (ECN) as the IT Project Coordinator in May 2013 and since then have had to face personal insults and verbal attacks on various social media. However, the moment I took issue with any personal attack (like on my personal Facebook page by a Namibia "investigative" journalist), I get reminded that I am an official of the ECN and should act more professionally.
Having been a social commentator since my student days I found it very difficult to understand that other people could confuse my personal life with my professional one. At one point I had to take out my "street manners" learnt in Hillbrow, Johannesburg and give some serious foul language to these characters that got into my personal life. I did not feel good about using foul language (even though it worked) but had to make a point of separating my professional life with my personal opinions.
The attach on @IamCharlie had me once again evaluate the way we as humans react to the opinions of others when we feel that it is contrary to our own. This was further brought to the for by the following post from a friend:
#DemocracyRules!
Rule #1: If you do not wish to be silenced, do not prevent others from speaking.
Rule #2: If you do not want to be restricted, do not limit the movements of others.
This sentiment is not restricted to religions in Africa, but also the political parties. Most political parties (especially the "liberation parties"), have become a religion to their followers. Thus making a political party "holier than thou" and pushing a strategy of faith - even if you cannot see it you must believe in it.
I foresee that as long as we try to silence those who disagree with us, these type of senseless attacks will continue - whether the excuse is difference in religion or political beliefs.
The Seven Steps - understanding the Cape identity
The SEVEN STEPS of District Six as a symbolic tool for
understanding Cape identity
To anyone who has had an association with old District Six,
the very mention of the ‘Seven Steps’ immortalised in Taliep Petersen’s musical
‘District Six’, stirs up deep emotions. The Seven Steps of stone worn by the
thousands who climbed these to work, to home, to school, to play, to bok, to
church, to mosque, to shop, to celebrate and to mourn, were part of the great
big soul of the district. Today, so many years after its destruction, the Seven
Steps stands out as the premier symbol of District Six. The District Six museum
has it as an integral part of its brand and logo. There is a reverence at its
mention – seven after all is God’s number. Seven is the dobbelaars ‘Lucky
Number’.
The Seven Steps of stone worn by the thousands who climbed
these to work, to home, to school, to play, to ‘bok’, to church, to mosque, to
shop, to celebrate and to mourn, were part of the great big soul of the
district.
District Six became Cape Town’s own Harlem. This Cape
African Creole district on the edge of the city had its roots as one of the
first settlements of freed urban slaves after emancipation. It was also the
first home of African dockworkers from the Eastern Cape, sailors who jumped
ship and poor European immigrants. The district grew over the years and became
the cultural heart and soul of Coloured people. Some 40 000 people were living
there. In 1966 the Apartheid regime began a forced removals process after
declaring the colourful district as a ‘whites only’ part of the city. The
forced removals, accompanied by wholesale demolitions saw the dwellings of the
entire district raised to the ground. First Africans and then Coloured people
were moved to the Cape Flats. The forced removals finally ended in 1986 when
the last of the people were moved out. To add fuel to the fire, the district
was renamed Zonnebloem - sunflower.
In the heart of District Six stood the seven stone steps
which became one of those symbols of District Six that lives in the hearts of
all who lived, loved, played and worked in the ‘District’. The seven steps
became a powerful representation of popular memory.
The physical District Six is lost somewhere on the patch of
earth and grass that remains like a gash on the body of our city. The District
Six Museum is custodian of some of the old blocks of stone, the steps, and some
pictures and paintings exist, but the greatest legacy symbolised by the seven
steps is etched in our hearts. The spirit of District Six lives on.
There were seven stone steps in the heart of old District
Six which holds a special place in the hearts of many and it is a powerful
symbol of the heritage of Cape Town. The Seven Steps also speaks of the Seven
Roots of identity in the Cape. The Coloured community in particular shares all
of these roots of identity. (While some are comfortable with the term
‘Coloured’ many do not accept the term and feel uncomfortable with it, but no
universally accepted term for people of mixed origins has ever emerged to find
acceptance. I personally do not like the term and express myself as having a
Cape Creole African identity as a South African, but I also do not shy away
from using the term Coloured as it is more generally understood and used.
Creole simply means ‘new creation’ or ‘locally born’).
Most people of the Cape from all population groups share two
or more of the Seven roots. There is at least one of these roots in everyone
and even the most recent to join us in this city and province has a place in
these Seven Steps. Everyone had a place in old District Six and the Seven Steps
stands out as a powerful symbol of diversity and inclusivity in the Cape. In
applying the symbolism of the Seven Steps to our heritage, each STEP represents
a root tributary to Cape identity as follows:
STEP 1: Represents the tributary of the INDIGENES. The
people of the Cape have strong African roots. The San, Khoe and amaXhosa in the
Cape and the baSotho and baTswana in western and northern reaches of the old
demarcated Cape Colony are the first tributary of Cape identity. The Coloured
people of the Cape have deep African roots with a number of traditional African
communities, sharing ancestors and many elements of cultural heritage. History
also shows us that communities such as the amaXhosa of today, share San, Khoe,
Asian and European ancestors with Coloured communities. There is a strong
cousin-connection across ethno-social boundaries in the Cape.
STEP2: Represents the tributary of the SLAVES. We are the
descendents of Slaves from other parts of Africa and Madagascar, from India and
from the Indonesian Islands. Over the period 1653 – 1808 over 63 000 slaves
were brought to the Cape from these areas. Around 32 500 of these slaves came
from Africa and Madagascar, 19 000 from India, and 11 500 from the Indonesian
islands. Between 1808 – 1856 a further 8000 mainly African slaves were brought
to the Cape as ‘Prize Negro’ slaves captured from slaver vessels by the Royal
Navy. The locally born children and successive grandchildren of these slaves
were all to lead lives of slavery until emancipation in 1836. For many ‘Prize
Slaves’ emancipation only came in dribs and drabs right through to 1870 and the
last slaves arrived in 1890.
STEP 3: Represents the tributary of the FREE BLACKS. We are
descendents of the Free Blacks of the Cape – a category of people that once
were poised to be a socio-economic group to be reckoned with in early Cape
development, but later for a number of reasons became powerless. Early
Mardijkers soldiers from Ambonya in the employ of the VOC, Free Black
travellers, soldiers and sailors, the manumitted slaves, and freed black
convicts all became part of those referred to as Free Blacks.
STEP 4: Represents the tributary of the EUROPEANS. We are
descendents of a range of Europeans who intermarried with, or who had children
with Indigenes, Slaves and Free Blacks. In the early founding years of the Cape
Settlement the mainly German, Dutch, Swiss, Portuguese, French and
Scandanavians were mainly male and took black partners. Many Europeans were
also transient and never settled in the colony but left children behind. There
were always Europeans, across the centuries, who had children with black
partners and this carried on when the English, Irish and Scots arrived in South
Africa. The Europeans settled and made their homes in Africa as a local people,
but their bloodlines can also be found amongst indigene groups and Coloured
communities, as much as indigene and Coloured bloodlines can be found in the
descendent European communities.
STEP 5: Represents the tributary of the MAROONS. We are
descendents of runaway slaves, Free Black rebels, mixed ‘Baster’ descendents of
indigenes and slaves, non-conformists Europeans, escaped convicts, and
eccentric missionaries. They became the freedom-trekkers who moved as far away
from the reaches of the colonial government, long before the Boer Great Trek,
to the long wild territory along the Garieb river in the north west, and to the
amaXhosa territory in the east. Here these Drosters or Maroons mixed with Khoe,
San, Xhosa and other indigenes and formed new groups such as the Orlams
Afrikaners, the Bergenaar Basters, the Springboks, and the Griquas. Others
joined the Xhosa armies and resisted both the Boers and later the British.
STEP 6: Represents the tributary of the EXILES &
REFUGEES: We are the descendents of outspoken fighters and political leaders
who challenged the Dutch, Portuguese, and Spanish in various territories in
Indonesia and Polynesia. Indonesian Muslim resistance leaders were tried and
banished into exile at the Cape; Peranakan Chinese from the Chinese resistance
after the massacres of Chinese by the Dutch in Batavia; and Philippine refugees
from the Phillipine Revolution - the Manillas, landed up at different times in
the Cape and integrated into what was later called the Coloured population. In
later years, to this day, new exile and refugee groups would continue to
trickle into the Cape, make this place their home and integrate with other
communities.
STEP 7: Represents the tributary of the INDENTURES &
MIGRANTS: We are descendents of a range of people who were brought to the Cape
as indentured labourers or who were economic migrants. After slavery was
formally ended at the Cape, first the ‘Prize Boys’ were forced to accept
indentureship as labourers, then farmers began importing indentured labour from
the Congo, Malawi, Botswana and Mozambique. Most of these ‘Indentures’ were
settled in the Drakenstein and integrated with both the Coloured communities and
the amaXhosa who were working in the district since the late 1700s.
Already many of the freed slaves in the Drakenstein were
those from East Africa known locally as the Mosbiekers. The Mosbieker pool grew
as indentureship was continually extended over the 19th century.
From the 1840s and increasing in the 1870s right through to
1910 and beyond, large groups of people were brought in as indentured servants
from St Helena. The Saints as they were known were also descendents of slaves,
Chinese and British settlers on the island of St Helena.
In 1890 the Ormoro North African slaves (Somalia) seized
from a slaver ship were brought to the Cape and these also integrated into
Coloured and amaXhosa communities.
Also amongst the migrants were West Africans of the Kru
tribe who had been employed by the Royal Navy in Simonstown for almost a
century (1830 – 1930). These Kroomen as they were locally known also integrated
into the Coloured community. Their grave markers can still be seen in
Simonstown today. In the late 1800s the Royal Navy began recruiting Siddis and
Zanzibaris from displkaced African communities scattered along the African and
Indian coasts. Siddis and Zanzibaris like the Kru also integrated into Cape
society.
Migrants and other infusions into the Cape society carry on
to this day. Through our sea ports relationships have produced children with
Chinese and other seaman of many nations. Economic migrants and refugees from
other African countries still arrive daily and take their place among us as they
always have. District Six was a key centre that became a microcosm
manifestation of the coming together of all of these tributaries and the
creolisation of cultures that gave us the rich and diverse locally born Cape
African heritage that we celebrate today.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
The Enduring Argument for Rent Control in Namibia: An Updated Perspective (2025)
The escalating rental prices in Namibia, particularly in Windhoek, remain a critical concern, much as they were over a decade ago when The N...
-
All round is haste, confusion, noise. For power and wealth men stretch the day From dawn till dusk. But quietly I go my way. For glit...
-
29.12.2009 Marson Sharpley writes: WELL done people of Namibia, my fellow countrymen and women! We have to be proud of the manner in whi...
-
New Era article To many Namibians, the name Rehoboth sound too familiar because it is a well-known small town located about 90 Km south o...